Status Report
- Due Feb 12, 2021 by 11:59pm
- Points 24
- Submitting a website url
- Available Jan 25, 2021 at 12am - Feb 16, 2021 at 11:59pm
Description of what you need to do for this submission is given in the following writeups:
PDF: status.pdf
Thanks!
Rubric
Keep in mind that 739 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Website
Given the URL, check out the website and the video summary. You should grade the website on the requirements above: Is the team name unique to the project? Is the first page not the default one, and is somewhat interesting? Does the team page look cleanly formatted? Overall, does it look like a website with polished content that can shared publicly? Give the appropriate score, and write a paragraph to justify it. You are not supposed to evaluate the technical content of the website when doing this.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||||||
Video
Find the video on the status page, watch it, and evaluate it for the requirements from the video. Primarily, was the video easy to understand and follow? Was the problem setup clear from the video? Was the general approach evident? What did you think of the implementation, does it seem like a reasonable prototype of the goals of the project? As before, provide a grade, and justify it in a paragraph, as the peer evaluator.
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||||||
Report
Finally, read the status report, available on the status.html page, and evaluate it for the criteria described above. Was the summary adequate for you to understand the problem? Is the approach described in the appropriate level of detail? Were the experiments evaluating all the aspects of the project you think are important? Are there obvious baselines the group did not take into account? What did you think of the results? Do you think the plan for the next few weeks look reasonable? When providing the grade, justify it by using as many paragraphs as needed (I expect at least one each for the approach and for the evaluation).
threshold:
pts
|
|
pts
--
|
||||||||
Total Points:
80
out of 80
|