The first rough draft of my HCP is very messy and disorganized. The transition between paragraphs do not flow well because I lack transitional sentences. When I wrote my HCP, I did not look at the peer review guideline because I did not want to be restrained on what I write. However, I will have to use the peer review questions as well as the grading rubric on my next draft in order to meet the requirements. When was writing the HCP, I kept in mind that the paper should have a clear explanation of the issue of cannabis ads and how it relates to the First Amendment. Although the rough draft lacks considerable ideas and research, it is a big improvement as compared to my HCP prospectus. The HCP prospectus is rather brief and unprofessional since I was unsure on where my essay was heading to. Also, I encountered difficulties incorporating historical events and experts on the issue of cannabis ads. Thus, I seeked for help during office hours as well as from my peers. My first draft had better evidence and support on the debate of cannabis advertisements. I used a variety of sources such as online articles, news report, scholarly journals, research papers, and debates to support the claim. Yet, I must not state any personal opinion on the debate because the paper would end up like a argument essay instead. Therefore, I tried to stay neutral on the HCP paper. Eventually, I will lean towards restriction on cannabis ads despite protection of the first amendment and this will be hinted in the conclusion. My opinion has not changed since the beginning of this project and I believe my persistency will strengthen my argument on the next project. I did not write a conclusion in the first draft because I feel that I need to make sure my essay is going to the right direction before I finalize the conclusion. Overall, the first draft still requires a lot of improvements.