In the email about feedback for my rough draft,
This is great work, but I would give it a 91, because you should go into more detail about your poster and
how it symbolizes your message. I can meet tomorrow, are you free?
I became confused on how I should go into more detail given that I had already stated the problem, made
necessary adjustment to improve persuasiveness, and provided many solutions to my problem. So I quickly
scheduled a meeting with my professor to ask him to elaborate on that topic. In the meeting I was enlightened
about the issue he stated, I misunderstood what he meant in the email and made careless assumptions. The
problem in my work is that even though I did make a good analysis of the message and had claims supported by
secondary sources, I wasn't referencing the claims back to my poster and platform. This made it so that my
claims were just simply related to the real world but has nothing to do with the poster I created. Upon realizing
my mistake, I swiftly integrated the references I was missing into the essay. Furthermore, I also touched upon
the technique used in my project as part of my analysis.